Friday, October 14, 2011
HoD Post - Chapter 1, Part 2
Throughout his encounters with the accountant, manager, and brick maker, one name reappears, Mr. Kurtz. Although Mr. Kurtz has not yet been physically introduced to the reader, we can only image how mysterious and influential of a person he must be. Ever character who Marlow meets has nothing to say but good things about Mr. Kurtz. He is described as an “exceptional man, of the greatest importance to the company,” and being a “remarkable person.” The general manager, even comments on how influential Mr. Kurtz is though he is set to take the manager’s position. Other depictions of Mr. Kurtz include his artistic ability, seen in the remarkable painting that is found to be dark and notable to Marlow. The painting, for me, is comparable between the darkness of the art and the darkness of the tone in the first chapter. This connection is further enhanced with Marlow’s perception and obvious reflection on the piece and it’s characteristics.
Although Marlow admits at the end of the chapter that he is not “very interested in him” (Kurtz), throughout the entire chapter ever occasion where his name is brought up brings perked ears and full attention to any dealings concerning this mysterious man.
Section two is also able to reveal Marlow’s comfortableness that is being gained as the story ventures on. Not only have his opinions of the African people appeared to change, but he begins to participate in acts influenced by pressure, perhaps, when confronted with others who raise interest in him and his connection with Europe (like the brick maker and rivets conversation). Has Marlow become too comfortable?
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
E.C. Post: Light vs. Dark
In his story Barn Burning, William Faulkner employs light/dark and white/black imagery to highlight Abner's actions and emotions. Darkness is a symbol of mystery, not knowing what will happen simply because we use our eyes to understand our surroundings. Faulkner uses this darkness and black night to signify the evil, mystery, and crime of Abner constant barn burning. Anytime any abuse or hurt occurs in the story, black and darkness is present. Moving away from the symbolizing the night, the darkness can also be found in Abner's being and soul. This blackness symbolizes Abner's lack of clarity. His constant disgust with the wealthy has made him into someone who does not really care for anything but revenge.
The lightness corresponds with the fire contrasting against the dark night's sky. In this fire carries Abner's burning emotions for revenge. The white heat and lightness carries a significance of being pure and without sin; ironic because the barns were being set on fire through hatred. The revelation and purity that Faulkner disguises into the burning of barns also signifies Abner trying to start a new being although, in many cases, it is not to his families advantage.
On the spectrum of color, black and white are polar opposites. Abner finds himself in the middle between the two shades, neither completely good or evil. Faulkner even refers to Abner as being “gray” and metaphorically dead, highlighting Mr. Snopes' lack of clarity and obsession with revenge. At the end of the story, Faulkner contrasts black and white. After Abner is shot during the night, his son Sarty exits during the dawn. This transition connotes Sarty's new life (ironically resulting from death) away from barn burning and away from the constant tyranny of his father.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
And the Darkness continues
i h8 darkness
I'm starting to get a heart of darkness...
I swear, this book is bringing out such a variety of undesired, negative emotions in me. Just to list a few: frustration, confusion, disgust, pity, boredom, anger, annoyance. The majority of characters that have been introduced so far are greedy, pathetic, and indifferent snobs. Particularly the fleshy “white companion” Marlow traveled with over hill and dale for two hundred miles really tugged at my last nerve. I would never be able to endure an arduous journey like that with such a wuss of a man that required you to “hold your own coat like a parasol” over his needy, flaccid body. His proud admission to having been driven to the extreme wilderness of Africa by the insatiable desire “to make money, of course” paired with his superfluous weight caused me to mentally place him as a shade in the Third Circle of Hell as depicted in Dante’s Inferno; the level at which gluttons are punished with eternal foul, slushy rain.
Further reading and discovery of equally as revolting new characters encouraged my connection of the various characters to the shades representative of certain sins encountered in Inferno. For example, the manager is obviously not the most cunning of people but “inspired uneasiness” and seems generally corrupt. He would fit perfectly as a shade of falseness and treachery in the Eighth Circle.
As for this mystery man Mr. Kurtz, he could be compared to as Satan, who in the Inferno, seemed ever present, the awaited grand finale. Mr. Kurtz has so far been described in legendary vagueness but apparent greatness. He is the brains behind the whole operation occurring in the Congo and it is my assumption that like Satan, he will be none other than an egotistical swindler.
Who is Mr. Kurtz Really?
Another important aspect of the story arises in this section: Mr. Kurtz. This man appears elusive to Marlow, yet, through the dialogue of the other characters, Marlow understands the power that Mr. Kurtz has. He is a man who almost becomes a legend to Marlow because of his power and mysteriousness. However, Marlow does not see any true component of Mr. Kurtz as substantial. This correlates directly with his comparison of the people he meets in the station. Marlow describes these people as “paper mache,” and “hollow.” I think this may relate to how everyone wants to fill Mr. Kurtz position when he is finally promoted. Mr Kurtz is empty and hollow, similar to how his position will be soon. Also, I think that this “hollow” personality may, as we find out more about Mr. Kurtz, his official job in Africa, and his imperialistic system, describe a possible callous attitude towards the Africans that is accented by an unending feeling of greed. I think that Mr. Kurtz is a man who is hollow because he feels no remorse or feelings for the Africans that he treats poorly and is only focused on money, with no important or valuable characteristics or traits. It seems almost as though Mr. Kurtz may have a heart of darkness..... probably not but it was worth a shot.
Hm, TMI.
Stuff about things
Shine the light so the shadows may spread.
Marlow furthers my thoughts of him as a pseudo-Virgil figure by figuratively going deeper into the “heart of darkness”, where he is now at Central Station where his boat has already been wrecked before he got there. The wreck itself seems to be pretty significant to the story line, but what meaning could Conrad have for it? “I did not see the real significance of that wreck at once, I fancy I see it now, but I am not sure.” (Pg.18). this seems to imply that the entire experience in Africa is so dark that not even hindsight is 20/20. What could this be foreshadowing that would be so bad as to black out Marlow’s memory. Marlow is quite the intriguing figure in my opinion. Every time that I pick this book up I am more interested in his thoughts and how he perceives the land.
The wreck of the boat itself can be fleshed out to a much higher extent however there is much more to be discussed here. While Marlow is in the station itself he seems to detest the white men that are there, he describes the manager as “He had no learning or intelligence.” (18) however, he also contradicts that as saying that the manager had something shadowy about him that couldn’t completely be ascertained by simply studying the man. Many things about the manager seem almost judgmental and otherworldly. He made a round table when annoyed by a fight about precedence amongst white people. This gives hint to the idea that he believes in equality where his negro was given the task to “treat the white men, under his very own eye [the manager’s], with provoking insolence.” So is the manager a sort of Devil’s advocate? To sort of rub in the face of the whites that the black man is still equal even though still under a servitude, or even a comment on how the white people under the manager are also slaves in their own sense?